Is It Ok To Eat Truffles When Pregnant

The person you called is not reachable at the moment ..

am again without internet and phone .. God C @ n
Oh well. The good news is that I started working and I start to feel better.
Who passes this way again I swear that I follow, other pc, to read at home once downloaded.
Hello everyone.

Where Is The Disney Store In Nsw

When you are wrong to say "award"



Only Mondadori can be called so, because it comes from the choice of De Benedetti and Berlusconi addresses three arbitrators appointed by them. The Alfano, however, is a simple law

a couple of weeks, Italians hear ringing in their ears, expression, "Lodo Mondadori", which sounds distant and unknown, through an information system, especially television that seems made for confusing even to those who.

The fact that the latest developments of the award Mondadori are intertwined with those of another award, the Alfano, added confusion to confusion. We must say what an "award" means a joint solution that closes out of court, a dispute between two parties, that is an argument. So the Alfano was not an award, but a law imposed by Berlusconi to freeze its processes. The Constitutional Court has also held unconstitutional, the law, and then processes the premier resume. Mondadori, however, was that for an award. What happened? In 1990 and Carlo De Benedetti and Silvio Berlusconi claimed ownership of the largest Italian publishing group, by virtue of two successive agreements to acquire the control of the family Formenton-Mondadori.

The two sides decided to entrust the dispute to a panel of three arbitrators: one appointed by De Benedetti, a Formenton by Berlusconi and the other by the Supreme Court. Eventually the arbitrators issued a decision of the arbitrators that gave reason to De Benedetti: Mondadori was his as the holders of a majority had promised before him. At that point, Knight and his allies challenged the ruling and brought before the Court of Appeal in Rome. This, in January '91, overturned the ruling and gave Berlusconi the Mondadori publishing house, which contained not only the branch books, but several newspapers: La Repubblica, L'Espresso, Panorama, Epoca and a dozen local newspapers. Then, thanks to the revelations of Stefania Ariosto and bank transactions in Switzerland discovered, it was discovered that the lawyers of Fininvest - Cesare Previti, Attilio Pacifico and Giovanni Acampora - ruling that they had bought with money of Fininvest, to pay to the court that he had signed , Vittorio Metta, at least 420 million in cash. What's more, it was discovered that the ruling had not written Metta, but someone inspired by the same lawyers Fininvest: the corrupt judge it took him only the signature, filed 160 pages of handwritten motivation in just 24 hours (a company that even Balzac) , then began to collect money is not justified, and finally left the Judiciary to go to work as a lawyer in the previous study with his daughter Sabrina. The Supreme Court finally ruled against both the judge and three lawyers, who been saved thanks to the statute of limitations (although the decision states that the sentence had been bought "in his interest" and that he was "corrupting private "behind the operation. In essence, For twenty years the Knights have the first Italian publishing group (of which restored the Republic, Express and local newspapers to the group De Benedetti-Carracciolo) thanks to a ruling bought with his money by his lawyers in his interest.

why the criminal courts, condemning the judge and lawyers, have said that De Benedetti was compensated for their losses in a separate civil case: the one that ended three weeks ago, at first instance, with the verdict of Judge Raymond Mesiano , who quantified the damage at 750 million euro. Mesiano was just to establish what we had put De Benedetti, but that compensation was due by the Fininvest had already said the Supreme Court.

Now of course the Knight launched the war against the national media, of course, "communist", the author of the award, of course "policy." And his newspaper wrote that compensation is a "theft", an "expropriation", a "political attack". But politics has nothing to do.

Marco Travaglio

the Spoiler

A (nna) October 22, 2009

Sixty Years Old Women Images

Process Mills, B. Mafia accused back, now trembles Dell'Utri

October 31, 2009

Corruption hearing in Milan on November 27. News in Palermo.
of Joseph Lo Bianco

Rejected the immunity law, in Milan, the Court fixed November 27 for the trial of Silvio Berlusconi , accused of having bribed the British lawyer David Mills sentenced to four years and six months because of corruption. In Palermo, the Court of Appeal considered''relevant''in the words of regret Spatuzza Gaspar, who has accused the prime minister to be the end of the bargain between the state and the Mafia in the massacres of the '93 season and admitted the testimony of the classroom associate justice. On the Milan-Palermo come two reports designed to remove the Prime Minister to sleep and his lawyers, predicting a very warm autumn for Berlusconi, called again in the courtroom to explain and defend itself.

In Milan magistrates burn time after delivery of the consultation rejecting the award Alfano lit the green light to the debate that will have to verify the accusation that the Prime Minister. And it is the time not to let the lawyers assured the prime minister: his prescription should arrive around the summer of 2011 but if everything remains as now, and Mills was finally convicted, his sentence would be a difficult test to ignore in the process because of Berlusconi matter of fact if there is a corrupt, there is also a corruptor. Instead

in Palermo, after having rejected the hearing of Massimo Ciancimino , The son of former Mayor mafia, contradictory to the contents of his revelations, the appellate court admitted the testimony of Gaspare Spatuzza, the killer regretted Brancaccio, right arm of the boss stragista Filippo and Giuseppe Graviano that Some respondents argued that the referents of political negotiations in the period of the massacres were in '93 and Dell'Utri Berlusconi, the latter sentenced in first instance to 9 years for complicity with the Mafia.

It is expected to Palermo to the new revelations that link''in''high, calling into question the prime minister directly as a partner of that phase of negotiation with Cosa Nostra is not excluded the court, after listening to the words of Spatuzza, cited by Nino Gatto pm, may have new findings, including a new questioning of Berlusconi at Palazzo Chigi on his alleged links with the Mafia. Experience is not new to the prime minister who was asked six years ago, also at Palazzo Chigi, the Court headed by Judge Leonardo Guarnotta away in Rome on that occasion he used the right to remain silent advised by his lawyers. ''We put this decision into account - the lawyer said yesterday Giuseppe Di Peri, the senator's office - even if we Spatuzza statements are absolutely not proven. "

Now the court will decide on 6 November Spatuzza date and place of interrogation, even after you have purchased and stored the records that the employee has made to the judiciary of Caltanissetta. The judges finally decide only after hearing the quote sorry if the witness stand, as urged by the prosecutor, the three heads of mafia and Giuseppe and Filippo Graviano Cosimo Lo Nigro, witnesses, according Spatuzza, talks in which he would learned about the role of Berlusconi and Dell'Utri. Two, in fact, matches in which they also participated Lo Nigro, in which, first with Joseph and then with his brother Philip, he learned that Spatuzza between Cosa Nostra and the State was being negotiated, which would last until 2004, and that the referents political bosses were just Dell'Utri and Berlusconi.

Done by The Newspaper No. 34, October 31, 2009