Friday, March 19, 2010

Block Calls From A Number On A Samsung Reclaim

The law of freedom

The case of the regional lists is not a serious one (who said the rules must also respect them), is also a bit 'absurd: the PDL was not the party of efficiency?


As I write, no one knows yet how it will end the Mess and very ridiculous list of the PDL excluded from the regional Lazio and Lombardy. But do not think I lean too much if I expect a nice amnesty, legislative or judicial will to give in to those who came out of time deposit in the listings (Lazio, the list Polverini) and who has submitted forged signatures (New York, Formigoni to list). The current climate is that.
You say right, you can not remove the right to vote to half the population of Lazio and Lombardy. Everyone says so, but I strongly disagree. And of course, I would not even if, as happened in the past to violate the election laws were lists of the center. For years we hear the slogan of the "primacy of politics", or even the "people". They are all nonsense. Above politics and above the people is the law, equal for all. The rule of law, the rule is the law. What is sacred and immutable, is a simple agreement that, right or wrong, people give themselves to live together without seats. Who said that the signatures must be 5 000 or 20 000 or 55 thousand? Who said that the lists should be submitted within 12, or 14, or the 22:44? The law. Without that, everyone must observe. If one does not observe it, the judge sanctioned.
whining like the little children of primary school, that you were late because you are getting traffic, it has sounded the alarm, the nanny was sick. leave time that is. What then to cry, in our case, both the "party of doing," one founded by businessman-president who solves problems with the air of the managers and decisions, which wants to turn the country into a company, it is simply ridiculous. Debase the electoral laws - made, inter alia, by the same politicians who complain that when the caught violating - a troublesome bureaucratic loopholes is a boomerang: who has the majority, if not agree with a law can change it. The only thing I can not do is step on and then, after the fact, screaming that he did not like. Is not that Berlusconi for 16 years promises to clearing the bureaucratic jungle? If you have not done in the eight years he ruled with ample majority, worse for him.
At every election, local or national level, there is always some list that fails to collect the necessary signatures and is excluded from voting. Sorry, because of its potential voters may not vote on it, but who is the cause of his ill cry himself. Mica you can ask the courts to put a hand on his heart and glossing over irregularities, because the list came "just ten minutes later" or fails "only a few signatures." The deadline
and numbers them down the law: judges can not help but apply it. Instead, the rulers of the People of Freedom (to do what pleases them most) they started screaming, and blamed the radical "left" (which even if it would not be able to plot against anyone, except against itself ), mobilized the square (do not know against whom), have threatened to launch a half civil war, and they started tinkering with sneaky and from providing for their own lists to condone breaking the law. What is the difference between their illegality and those in the years, have taken off the list of dozens of lists irregular? None, apart from the fact that they scream louder and use power to abuse it for their own use. Before breaking the law, then if the change made to measure. As for false accounting, tax evasion, illegal building. As with the "short trial" and "legal impediment".
Then they wonder if the 'Ndrangheta is elected a senator of confidence and if lawlessness is rampant at all levels. But if the laws do not even respect those who practice them, why should they respect those who do not do them?


Marco Travaglio
The damper
March 11, 2010 Anna

0 comments:

Post a Comment