words Daniele De Rossi on the card of a fan raised a big fuss. I honestly do not understand why. He has only extended the category of persons from "card" to the forces of order. And 'his simple reasoning: if we put a case officer is incapable of handling the situation in a stadium, well, he can not for some time to practice his profession in a stadium. It is not clear why a fan is worth and not a guardian of order. Yet they are
many cases where some agents in the stadium did not behave at: just think of the young Stefano Gugliotta, Alessandro Spoletini or Sergio Ercolano. Speaking of Gabriele Sandri and the impunity of his murderer would be even too obvious. So, to summarize? What did he say wrong Daniele De Rossi to move to several Members, the Minister of the Whole, the police union and Manganelli ? His speech seems very sensible.
Ironically, one could also extend to politicians. Since the card's fan is also known as card privileges, that is a card that gives priority to the good fans, why not do it also for politicians as well as for the cops? That is, in short, if a politician was not cleaned in the past 5 years (a short term) can not have any constitutional position. At the end of the parliament, the senate and local councils are the stages as: yelling, have banners, you menano, saying homosexual is insulting. Even when you had to choose someone wrote the President of the Republic Francesco Totti and many supporters' clubs to House. So? It would be absurd even this reasoning?
not really thorough piece of the fan. Even here there was some article, and sifting through the internet is something for those who know little. I just want to talk about the failure of years of political anti-ultras, which certainly is the top card of the fan. Surely eventually be able to make the English stage, perhaps with stores in and no problems of public order. This seems to me the purpose of the charter of privileges: just create a stadium only for privileged people. But you know that football is a sport that usually draws the privileged, indeed. And here is the great failure of policies to combat hooliganism.
Firstly: The ultras violence is not a factor in the last decade or two. Even without statistics in hand enough to remember Vincenzo Paparelli . The policy curve is not a thing happened only recently, but it is still a phenomenon that already existed before. If there was a deterioration, it was probably the barbarity of the violence ultras. What is becoming increasingly blind and useless. But this is also depended upon the fact that you were not quite able to enhance those aspects of the ultras who deserved to be valued. One above all: typhoid.
No young man approaches the curve to make a fight: you approach the curve for the life of the choruses, the choreography, the flags. At 8 years old, was a Roma-Bari, I spent plenty of time to see what they did those of the curve in CUCS South, and for years I continued to see half the game, half what it was combined in turn. I always liked, I always found it fascinating and just as I have also attended more directly, I spent hours of my time to sing, cheer and think about things related to typhoid.
I did that also and especially for a team that was not Rome, and I never seemed ridiculous. I really like typhus. Here, if the tap root for repression quell violence in the corners really understood much. Instead it was: after the murder Raciti, after the death of Sandri, cornering could no longer enter flagpoles, megaphones, banners. Remove the soul of the ultras tifo in the world is taking them off the most beautiful and emphasize violence as the only form of expression. This is the great failure of the fan and the card is just the latest stage of a journey that has gone through the death of fans and even agents. To say that years of success have been absurd. To say that the DASPO and Pisanu has worked to say nonsense. Who knows how it goes now ...
It is probably the fact that the ultras world was wrong. Maybe he was wrong not to organize in time, by giving precedence to the parochial divisions. Surely he was wrong by giving precedence to the soul hooligan, hooligan soul as well as those who wanted to wanted to prevail. But one thing is certain. Violence is everywhere. In clubs, in the streets. It is not clear why only shocked at stadiums. Maybe just because it is visible to everyone? Maybe just because it affects a market that is behind? Today's ultras stab you for a game. For a derby. Until the early 900's, always to stay in Rome, the favorite pastime of young stone-throwing was taking a knife or with other students from other districts. Today in 2010 things did not seem to change. Yet times have changed, culture and lifestyles. But young people continue to kill for trivial things really. These are many demagogic speech, I know. What then remains far-fetched and it would take another article to express their ideas about violence and nonviolence. But they are sure that the card's fan is not the answer to all these questions.
fact, I'm sure.
0 comments:
Post a Comment