I found some interesting article Angela Rangel, the number of the Fund on July 26, entitled Roma Città Futura. Between clouds and rainbows.
are undoubtedly true that many things he says, especially when in Rome says that the building speculators have played a crucial role by decades of economic boom today. I have a little life by voters, also quite messy and incoherent as my life path. But one thing I never did: vote for the mayor of Rome. It will be a gesture rather childish, but I've always been convinced that the real "King of Rome" were in fact the building speculators, and so I always found it unnecessary to vote one or another party (beyond the political ideas that changed in my head) . Maybe, but the documentary's Report two years ago entitled "The King of Rome" (which is easily visible with a search on the site of transmission) was deeply understand the union between the center-left administration Capitolina (in this case) and the kings who built the brick quarters enormous speculation in full and in full connection with the power of the Capitol. One of them has come even in a delirium of omnipotence, to feel philanthropic or hero: this is a way autodedicato with his surname.
The number of "bedroom communities" built in recent years, arrived in Rutelli-Veltroni is impressive. We have only to cite or Bufalotta Ponte di Nona, or maybe go for a ride, to understand the enormity the damage that these gentlemen have to pay this city. Out huge districts plan, where no infrastructure was built to withstand the impact of such a high number of residents. Neighborhoods without services, as the only service is the big mall that was built before the buildings (so to immediately understand the scale of the thing). Angel Rangel is right, especially because it would be enough to remember the speed with which Veltroni, having abdicated from the office of mayor, he hastened to approve the plan, or think that Robert Morassut then Councillor for Urban Planning of the municipality of Rome was precisely investigated for all that the cottage Report pulled up (without forgetting that the Morassut then denounced Report, and we would say "What changes with Berlusconi denouncing the Republic? However, there is an attack on press freedom?").
But Angelo forgets something. Forget that speculation in Rome, not just the last twenty years. Unfortunately, the capital, has always lived this situation. The reasons are many: here are the centers of power, here is the seat of God and especially here in so many come to try their luck: they were the first immigrants from Southern Italy, now we are the immigrants of Eastern and Southern World. Havoc under the sky of Rome has seen so many: he saw the inhabitants of Trastevere (her neighborhood more beautiful and Roman) evicted from the 50s onwards it into a trendy and the same thing you do is seen by the Monti district (the district that if the "beat" with the Trastevere). Angelo forgets something, but I do not think it does in bad faith. It does for me anyway because his article was, say, a bit 'ideological (if you pass me the term): the important thing is to show that Mussolini in Rome, these things she was not, in fact. Certainly Angelo quotes the EUR. And who can doubt that it is not still a thing well done? May like or not the architecture of that project but certainly not a massacre. But there are things you just forget Angelo. There is a
book published by Laterza, which is titled The Myth of Rome. Da Carlo Magno a Mussolini and is written by Andrea Giardina and André Vauchez. In this book, just talking about the myth of Rome through the centuries. He cites the words of Mussolini in 1925 addressed to the governor of Rome, words that inspire the development plan for 1931: "You will continue to release the trunk of the great oak that still overshadows everything. You will round off the Augusteo, theater Marcello, the Capitol, the Pantheon. Everything you grew up around in the centuries of decadence must disappear [...] The old monuments of our history must gigantic development in the necessary solitude. " The authors of the text continues: "What meant ripped, cut, open plazas and major highways where the first buildings were medieval, Renaissance and Baroque churches, narrow streets and squares that made up an extraordinary urban landscape in which coexisted cultures and forms of many eras. But they were pulverized also valuable and significant memories of ancient Rome (the hill striking was the case of Velia, destroyed, or that of Meta Sudans), if they were an obstacle to the scenic effects [...] This has had a great importance in shaping a false image of the physical and social ancient Rome [...] He had read writers of the early imperial Rome had in fact seen a very different: driven by a teeming mix of voices and movements, public and private activities, a colorful city that he could remember, in some respects, the vivacity of the Arab souk [...] Here too, the case of what would be called via the Empire is exemplary . Open space left vacant by the demolition of an entire neighborhood medieval and modern .... "
That neighborhood was called Borgo destroyed Alexandria. And he was given space to shine alone in the Coliseum and get through because of the religious ceremonies of the Empire, that is Via dei Fori Imperiali, Piazza Venezia. It just was inserted near the Vittoriano in Rome has very few fans (and I certainly am not one of these). Not to mention the demolition of the Spina Borgo neighborhood, to make way for the path of conciliation, conceived and begun by Mussolini himself. Now, by the way, the spirit of the Fund and also mine is not to demonize all. But when you have to say things must be said. Dear Angelo, not everything can be nice what he did Mussolini.
After all this he thought, "Rome, a city of parasitic houses, shoe shine, prostitutes, priests and bureaucrats, Rome - a city without working class worthy of the name - not the center of national politics, but Although the center and the hearth of infection of national politics [...] Enough, then, with the stupid injury unit to which everything, everything, everything must be concentrated in Rome: in this huge city-vampire who sucks the best blood of the nation. "
pity that he, too, such as Savoy (who first destroyed the historic structure), as the DC-Rutelli and Veltroni as the junta have sucked their blood from this city. Destroying it and making it what it is today, a city almost impossible to live, where the speculation is on the agenda, where people are dying of rates and rents. And that will Alemanno? We'll see. For now we just have to see where her appear Polverini has placed Roberto Carlino ...
are undoubtedly true that many things he says, especially when in Rome says that the building speculators have played a crucial role by decades of economic boom today. I have a little life by voters, also quite messy and incoherent as my life path. But one thing I never did: vote for the mayor of Rome. It will be a gesture rather childish, but I've always been convinced that the real "King of Rome" were in fact the building speculators, and so I always found it unnecessary to vote one or another party (beyond the political ideas that changed in my head) . Maybe, but the documentary's Report two years ago entitled "The King of Rome" (which is easily visible with a search on the site of transmission) was deeply understand the union between the center-left administration Capitolina (in this case) and the kings who built the brick quarters enormous speculation in full and in full connection with the power of the Capitol. One of them has come even in a delirium of omnipotence, to feel philanthropic or hero: this is a way autodedicato with his surname.
The number of "bedroom communities" built in recent years, arrived in Rutelli-Veltroni is impressive. We have only to cite or Bufalotta Ponte di Nona, or maybe go for a ride, to understand the enormity the damage that these gentlemen have to pay this city. Out huge districts plan, where no infrastructure was built to withstand the impact of such a high number of residents. Neighborhoods without services, as the only service is the big mall that was built before the buildings (so to immediately understand the scale of the thing). Angel Rangel is right, especially because it would be enough to remember the speed with which Veltroni, having abdicated from the office of mayor, he hastened to approve the plan, or think that Robert Morassut then Councillor for Urban Planning of the municipality of Rome was precisely investigated for all that the cottage Report pulled up (without forgetting that the Morassut then denounced Report, and we would say "What changes with Berlusconi denouncing the Republic? However, there is an attack on press freedom?").
But Angelo forgets something. Forget that speculation in Rome, not just the last twenty years. Unfortunately, the capital, has always lived this situation. The reasons are many: here are the centers of power, here is the seat of God and especially here in so many come to try their luck: they were the first immigrants from Southern Italy, now we are the immigrants of Eastern and Southern World. Havoc under the sky of Rome has seen so many: he saw the inhabitants of Trastevere (her neighborhood more beautiful and Roman) evicted from the 50s onwards it into a trendy and the same thing you do is seen by the Monti district (the district that if the "beat" with the Trastevere). Angelo forgets something, but I do not think it does in bad faith. It does for me anyway because his article was, say, a bit 'ideological (if you pass me the term): the important thing is to show that Mussolini in Rome, these things she was not, in fact. Certainly Angelo quotes the EUR. And who can doubt that it is not still a thing well done? May like or not the architecture of that project but certainly not a massacre. But there are things you just forget Angelo. There is a
book published by Laterza, which is titled The Myth of Rome. Da Carlo Magno a Mussolini and is written by Andrea Giardina and André Vauchez. In this book, just talking about the myth of Rome through the centuries. He cites the words of Mussolini in 1925 addressed to the governor of Rome, words that inspire the development plan for 1931: "You will continue to release the trunk of the great oak that still overshadows everything. You will round off the Augusteo, theater Marcello, the Capitol, the Pantheon. Everything you grew up around in the centuries of decadence must disappear [...] The old monuments of our history must gigantic development in the necessary solitude. " The authors of the text continues: "What meant ripped, cut, open plazas and major highways where the first buildings were medieval, Renaissance and Baroque churches, narrow streets and squares that made up an extraordinary urban landscape in which coexisted cultures and forms of many eras. But they were pulverized also valuable and significant memories of ancient Rome (the hill striking was the case of Velia, destroyed, or that of Meta Sudans), if they were an obstacle to the scenic effects [...] This has had a great importance in shaping a false image of the physical and social ancient Rome [...] He had read writers of the early imperial Rome had in fact seen a very different: driven by a teeming mix of voices and movements, public and private activities, a colorful city that he could remember, in some respects, the vivacity of the Arab souk [...] Here too, the case of what would be called via the Empire is exemplary . Open space left vacant by the demolition of an entire neighborhood medieval and modern .... "
That neighborhood was called Borgo destroyed Alexandria. And he was given space to shine alone in the Coliseum and get through because of the religious ceremonies of the Empire, that is Via dei Fori Imperiali, Piazza Venezia. It just was inserted near the Vittoriano in Rome has very few fans (and I certainly am not one of these). Not to mention the demolition of the Spina Borgo neighborhood, to make way for the path of conciliation, conceived and begun by Mussolini himself. Now, by the way, the spirit of the Fund and also mine is not to demonize all. But when you have to say things must be said. Dear Angelo, not everything can be nice what he did Mussolini.
After all this he thought, "Rome, a city of parasitic houses, shoe shine, prostitutes, priests and bureaucrats, Rome - a city without working class worthy of the name - not the center of national politics, but Although the center and the hearth of infection of national politics [...] Enough, then, with the stupid injury unit to which everything, everything, everything must be concentrated in Rome: in this huge city-vampire who sucks the best blood of the nation. "
pity that he, too, such as Savoy (who first destroyed the historic structure), as the DC-Rutelli and Veltroni as the junta have sucked their blood from this city. Destroying it and making it what it is today, a city almost impossible to live, where the speculation is on the agenda, where people are dying of rates and rents. And that will Alemanno? We'll see. For now we just have to see where her appear Polverini has placed Roberto Carlino ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment